1 min read

Time Machine

Actually, this decision by the sovereign state of S. Dakota is a good thing.  Perhaps, more states will turn the clock back so their populace can once and for all define 'marriage'. Or ban stem cell research. Heck, they can even outlaw evolutionary biology for all I care.

Oh my god, they've invented a time machine and I've traveled 30 years to the past!

I assume that the South Dakota decision to ban abortion has been duly noted by some.  It's one of those issues that you can't be on the fence about.  Either you're a loony nut who screams 'What about the chillldren!" or you're a libpig who screams "It's her/my body!"

Personally, I think if guys could have babies, there'd be abortion clinics on every corner in the 'heartland'. "C'mon Willy, your 3rd abortion this quarter? Hon, get a grip!"

Actually, this decision by the sovereign state of S. Dakota is a good thing.  Perhaps, more states will turn the clock back so their populace can once and for all define 'marriage'. Or ban stem cell research. Heck, they can even outlaw evolutionary biology for all I care.

I'm hoping that more legislatures will follow S. Dakota's example, so that all the conservatives and the believers and the family value folks can move to those states.  Just leave the rest of us New York, California, and Massachusetts.  You guys don't want it anyways.  They're all infested with unholy sinners and devil worshipping heathens anyways.  Seriously -- I would love it if S. Dakota turns into the perfect conservative utopia. That would make my day.

Note: This bill does not allow exceptions for rape, incest, or health of the woman?

Ah, back to the good old days of the coat hanger.


this will affect all 17 of the people living in south dakota.

Posted by: ink | March 08, 2006 at 04:27 PM


that's what the french said about czechoslovakia in the 1920s. but yeah, s. dakota has lots of space for new residents.

Posted by: j.fisher | March 08, 2006 at 08:23 PM